surface water floods in switzerland: what insurance claim records tell us about the damage in space and time
Clicks: 193
ID: 163967
2017
Surface water floods (SWFs) have received increasing attention in the recent
years. Nevertheless, we still know relatively little about where, when and
why such floods occur and cause damage, largely due to a lack of data but
to some degree also because of terminological ambiguities. Therefore, in a
preparatory step, we summarize related terms and identify the need for
unequivocal terminology across disciplines and international boundaries in
order to bring the science together. Thereafter, we introduce a large
(n = 63 117), long (10–33 years) and representative
(48 % of all Swiss buildings covered) data set of spatially explicit
Swiss insurance flood claims. Based on registered flood damage to buildings,
the main aims of this study are twofold: First, we introduce a method to
differentiate damage caused by SWFs and fluvial floods based on the
geographical location of each damaged object in relation to flood hazard maps
and the hydrological network. Second, we analyze the data with respect to
their spatial and temporal distributions aimed at quantitatively answering
the fundamental questions of how relevant SWF damage really is, as well as
where and when it occurs in space and time.
This study reveals that SWFs are responsible for at least 45 % of the flood damage to buildings and 23 % of the associated direct tangible losses, whereas lower losses per claim are responsible for the lower loss share. The Swiss lowlands are affected more heavily by SWFs than the alpine regions. At the same time, the results show that the damage claims and associated losses are not evenly distributed within each region either. Damage caused by SWFs occurs by far most frequently in summer in almost all regions. The normalized SWF damage of all regions shows no significant upward trend between 1993 and 2013. We conclude that SWFs are in fact a highly relevant process in Switzerland that should receive similar attention like fluvial flood hazards. Moreover, as SWF damage almost always coincides with fluvial flood damage, we suggest considering SWFs, like fluvial floods, as integrated processes of our catchments.
This study reveals that SWFs are responsible for at least 45 % of the flood damage to buildings and 23 % of the associated direct tangible losses, whereas lower losses per claim are responsible for the lower loss share. The Swiss lowlands are affected more heavily by SWFs than the alpine regions. At the same time, the results show that the damage claims and associated losses are not evenly distributed within each region either. Damage caused by SWFs occurs by far most frequently in summer in almost all regions. The normalized SWF damage of all regions shows no significant upward trend between 1993 and 2013. We conclude that SWFs are in fact a highly relevant process in Switzerland that should receive similar attention like fluvial flood hazards. Moreover, as SWF damage almost always coincides with fluvial flood damage, we suggest considering SWFs, like fluvial floods, as integrated processes of our catchments.
Reference Key |
bernet2017naturalsurface
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
---|---|
Authors | ;D. B. Bernet;V. Prasuhn;R. Weingartner |
Journal | anziam journal |
Year | 2017 |
DOI | 10.5194/nhess-17-1659-2017 |
URL | |
Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.