Overview of meropenem-vaborbactam and newer antimicrobial agents for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae

Overview of meropenem-vaborbactam and newer antimicrobial agents for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae Lindsay A Petty,1 Oryan Henig,1 Twisha S Patel,2 Jason M Pogue,3 Keith S Kaye1 1Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; 2Department of Pharmacy Services, University of Michigan Hospitals and Health Centers, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; 3Department of Pharmacy Services, Sinai-Grace Hospital, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA Abstract: There has been a worldwide increase in infections caused by drug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens, including carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). Meropenem-vaborbactam, a carbapenem antibiotic and novel boronic acid-based beta-lactamase inhibitor, is a fixed-dose combination product with potent in vitro activity against Enterobacteriaceae that are Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase producers. Meropenem-vaborbactam has been studied in two Phase III trials, Targeting Antibiotic Non-susceptible Gram-negative Organisms (TANGO)-I and TANGO-II. TANGO-I was a multicenter, international Phase III, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-control trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of meropenem-vaborbactam for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection, including acute pyelonephritis. Among patients with complicated urinary tract infection and growth of a baseline pathogen, meropenem-vaborbactam was determined to be superior to piperacillin-tazobactam based on the composite outcome of symptom improvement or resolution and microbial eradication at the end of intravenous therapy. TANGO-II was a multicenter, international, Phase III, randomized, prospective, open-label, comparative trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of meropenem-vaborbactam vs best available therapy for CRE infections. Treatment with meropenem-vaborbactam resulted in higher rates of clinical cure at the end of therapy (64.3%vs 33.3%, P